Meehan

Nelson v. Meehan

Good Law
155 F. 1·2 Alaska Fed. 799·83 C.C.A. 374·1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4624
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 7, 1907No. 1,376California6,107 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hunt, J.

O. A. Nelson and G. N.. Hensley brought an action against Matt Meehan and T. Larson in December, 1903, in the United States District Court for the territory of Alaska, to compel the specific performance of a contract by which Meehan and Larson agreed to give to the plaintiffs a one-half interest in a certain mining claim, if the plaintiffs would sink thereon three holes to bed rock. The cause was tried by the court, and it was found that the plaintiffs had fulfilled the terms of the contract by sinking three holes to bed rock, and that as a conclusion they were entitled to have conveyed to them by the defendants the half interest specified in the contract. Thereafter, and on August 17, 1904, a decree was entered in favor of the plaintiffs in accordance with the findings of the court. Defendants moved for a new trial upon the grounds of insufficiency of evidence to justify the decision and errors of law duly excepted to upon the trial. This motion was overruled upon August 17, 1904. The defendants appealed to this court, and upon May 8, 1905, the decree of the District Court was affirmed. Meehan v. Nelson, 137 F. 731 , 70 C.C.A. 165 . The mandate of the Circuit Court of Appeals was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.