Noyes

Noyes v. Marlott

Good Law
156 F. 753·2 Alaska Fed. 842·84 C.C.A. 409·1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4737
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 1907No. 1,438California3,119 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hunt, J.

Defendants in error, Marlott, Melvin, and O’Mealey, brought this suit to recover the contract price of certain logs alleged to have been delivered by them to Noyes, plaintiff in error, in accordance with the provisions of a *844 certain written contract entered into on September 23, 1904. The contract is substantially as follows: “This agreement made this 23d day of September, 1904, by and between Fred G. Noyes, party of the first part, and Tony O’Mealey, John Melvin, and Arthur Marlott, parties of the second part, witnesseth: (1) That said parties of the second part agree to fell, cut, raft, drive and deliver not less than six hundred thousand (600,000) feet of logs of the approximate dimensions hereinafter described, in the channel or slough of the Chena river, a tributary of the Tanana river, in the district of Alaska, leaving said river, immediately below the unincorporated town or settlement of East Fairbanks, about a quarter of a mile above and opposite the town of Fairbanks, in the district of Alaska,' Third Division, and to furnish all necessary provisions, tools, tackle, apparel and booms for the purpose thereof. Two hundred thousand (200,000) feet of such logs shall be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.