Dalton

Dalton v. Gunnison

Caution
165 F. 873·3 Alaska Fed. 238·91 C.C.A. 457·1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4809
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 7, 1908No. 1,650California1,363 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gilbert, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The general rule is well established that, when judgment has been rendered and the term expires, a bill of exceptions cannot be allowed, signed, and filed as of the date of the trial, in the absence of the consent of the parties or of a previous order of the court reserving the power to do so, unless there are extraordinary circumstances which are sufficient to except the case from the rule.

In United States v. Breitling, 20 How. 252 , 15 L.Ed. 900 , the bill of exceptions was presented by the attorney for the United States during the term. Before the term adjourned, at the request of the court, the bill was submitted to opposing counsel. It was not again presented to the judge until a week after the term adjourned. It was then allowed and signed by the judge. The Supreme Court held that it was always within the power of the trial court to suspend its own rules or to except a particular case from its operation whenever the purposes of justice required it, and said that the time within which the bill of exceptions— “may be drawn up and presented to the court must depend on its rule and practice, and on its own judicial discretion. In the case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.