Freeding

Freeding v. Allen

Good Law
173 F. 263·3 Alaska Fed. 409·97 C.C.A. 429·1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5067
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 7, 1909No. 1,667California3,455 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ross, J.

The plaintiffs in error constitute the common council of the town of Nome, in the district of Alaska, and the defendants in error the school board of the Nome school district. The school board having presented a petition in writing to the court below, asking its order apportioning the federal license moneys collected by it in pursuance of law, so that the petitioner should receive 50 per cent, thereof, or such other percentage as the court should deem proper, up to the amount of $20,500, with which to pay the indebtedness already incurred and to be incurred during the school year then ensuing, and directing the treasurer of the town of Nome to pay directly to the petitioners such percentage of the license moneys as should be apportioned by the court for the purposes stated, and an order to show cause why the petition should not be granted having been served upon the plaintiffs in error by the direction of the court, objections were filed by them, to which the petitioners replied. The hearing resulted in these findings:

“(1) That the sum of $20,500 is the proper amount to be apportioned for the use of the school board for the purpose of enabling the board to pay the indebtedness…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.