Martin

Martin v. Burford

Good Law
104 C.C.A. 360·181 F. 922·3 Alaska Fed. 508·1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4884
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 3, 1910No. 1,712California2,338 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ross, J.

The plaintiff in error was plaintiff in the court below, where by his complaint he sought to recover damages from the defendants in error, who were defendants there, resulting to him by reason of certain alleged false and fraudulent representations alleged to have been willfully and wantonly made by the defendants in a certain written instrument, which is set out at large in the complaint, and which is as follows:

“Know all men by these presents: That we, George C. Burford, and J. B. Caro & Company, of the town of Juneau, district of Alaska, for and in consideration of the sum of two thousand ($2,000.00) dollars, to us in hand paid, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, do hereby sell, transfer and assign unto J. W. Martin, of the town of *510 Haines, Alaska, one-third iyi) interest in and to the following described property, to wit:

“One scow ‘Skagitt,’ her lines, gear, etc.; one scow ‘Volunteer,’ her lines, gear, anchor, etc.; one log float; seine boat, and seines; seines; sale barrels, tierces; salmon troughs; and one store building and site situated at Farragut Bay, Alaska, together with all things pertaining to the fishing outfit known as the ‘Arctic Fishing & Packing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.