Sutherland

Sutherland v. Pearce

Good Law
108 C.C.A. 657·186 F. 787·3 Alaska Fed. 580·1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4170
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 1911No. 1,947California849 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Morrow, J.

The appeal in this case docketed as No. 1,932 having been docketed by counsel for appellee and dismissed on January 5, 1911, upon the production of the certificate of the clerk of the District Court of Alaska reciting certain proceedings in that court, and this court having adjourned to the first Monday in February, the appellants filed a petition in the District Court of Alaska for a second appeal on January 24, 1911, and the appeal was on that day allowed. A cost bond in the sum of $500 was thereafter given and filed by the appellants. On the same day application was made to Judge Morrow of this court in San Francisco to fix the amount of a supersedeas bond on the second appeal. An order was accordingly made fixing such bond in the sum of $30,000. Under this order a supersedeas bond was filed February 7, 1911, in the District Court of Alaska, approved by Judge Lyons of that court.

Under section 506 of the Alaska Code of Civil Procedure, the time for taking an appeal from the decree of June 1, 1910, will not expire until June 1, 1911. The second appeal was therefore taken in time, and, if it should turn out that the first appeal was lost, such second appeal would become…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.