Halla

Halla v. Rogers

Good Law
109 C.C.A. 626·187 F. 778·3 Alaska Fed. 590·1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4229
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 1911No. 1,910California1,036 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wolverton, J.

This appeal is from an order of the trial court denying the motion of appellants for a dissolution of an injunction pendente lite.

It appears, from the bill of complaint for an injunction restraining defendants from interfering with and molesting plaintiffs in their possession of the Golden Bull mining claim, that the defendants Halla, Hammer, and Schwarz, on February 26, 1906, leased the said claim to F. R. Cowden, one of the plaintiffs, for a term ending July 1, 1909. The lease was assigned by Cowden to the Golden Bull Mining Company, a copartnership composed of all the plaintiffs except Fink and Orton. Subsequently Halla, Hammer, and Schwarz re-entered the leased premises, and the plaintiffs, except Fink and Orton, instituted an action of ejectment against them to recover possession under the lease. To maintain their defense, the defendants in said action set up that the plaintiffs therein had violated and broken certain covenants of the lease; but upon trial the plaintiffs were successful. An appeal was prosecuted to this court, resulting in an affirmance. Execution was stayed in the meanwhile. Upon mandate to the trial court, the mining company was in due course again put…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.