Reeder

Copper River & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Reeder

Good Law
127 C.C.A. 648·211 F. 280·4 Alaska Fed. 161·1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1736
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 2, 1914No. 2299California3,070 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wolverton, J.

The plaintiffs in error were defendants below. A judgment was rendered against them, and in favor of the defendant in error, from which this writ is prosecuted. The action was for damages on account of personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, occasioned by the breaking down of the roof of the tunnel in which he was at work, thus permitting the timbers and earth and gravel to be precipitated upon him.

The complaint alleges that the defendants were doing business as common carriers; that plaintiff was in their employ at the time, namely, August 7, 1911, and was at work *165 upon the line of railway extending from Cordova up the Copper river into the interior of Alaska. It is then further alleged that the accident by which plaintiff was injured as aforesaid was caused by the negligent failure of the defendants to furnish the plaintiff with a reasonably safe place to work; that said place was unsafe and dangerous by reason of the negligent failure of the defendants to suitably timber said tunnel and protect the workmen employed therein from the danger of cave-ins, and the falling of material constituting the roof of the bore thereof, all of which was known to the defendants, or by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.