Schoenwald

Schoenwald v. Bishop

Good Law
157 C.C.A. 163·244 F. 715·4 Alaska Fed. 578·1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2051
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 6, 1917No. 2817California1,576 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Morrow, J.

(after stating the facts as above).

The plaintiffs in error, to sustain their case as plaintiffs in the court below, first introduced in evidence the record in the case of Nevin v. Pacific Coast & Norway Packing Company in the superior court of King county, Wash. In the complaint in that case it was alleged that the plaintiff was a creditor of the defendant corporation; that the corporation at the time the suit was begun was financially embarrassed and could not meet its obligations as they matured; that suits had been begun against it, and, if its property was seized and sold at forced sale, sufficient could not be realized to meet its obligations; that it was in immediate danger of insolvency. The prayer of the complaint was *582 for the appointment of a receiver of the property, assets, and business of the corporation for the benefit of all of its creditors, and for a judgment against the corporation in the amount of $1,284, with costs and disbursements therein. In the answer of the corporation it asked that the complaint be dismissed, and for its costs and disbursements therein.

Upon the complaint being presented to the court, the court entered an order in which it was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.