Noyes

Noyes v. Wood

Good Law
159 C.C.A. 290·247 F. 72·4 Alaska Fed. 636·1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1639
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 1917No. 2593California5,359 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hunt, J.

This is a cross-appeal; the original appeal being No. 2528, Jesson et al. v. Noyes, as Receiver of the Washington-Alaska Bank, reported in 245 F. 46 , 157 C.C.A. 342 , to which reference may be had for the general nature of the suit. By this appeal the receiver asks review of certain findings and conclusions made by the lower court in respect *638 to the purchase of certain shares of bank stock, referred to as the Strandberg, Johnson, and McGinn stock, respectively, and also challenges the accuracy of certain conclusions of law and of the decree made upon the facts as found.

The substance of the finding of the court with relation to the purchases of the stock referred to is as follows:

The board of directors of the bank required monthly statements showing the condition of the bank, and on July 13, 1908, considered refunding to those who wished to give up their stock, and thereafter numerous surrenders were made by stockholders. Stock taken back by the bank was charged to treasury stock. On November 18, 1908, the stock of Strandberg Bros., 100 shares, Emma Strandberg, 10 shares, and Johnson, 10 shares, of an aggregate par value of $12,000, was taken up by the bank in part payment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.