Hinchman
De Gree v. Hinchman
165 C.C.A. 667·253 F. 986·4 Alaska Fed. 709·1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1633
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 30, 1918No. 3202California48 words
Lead Opinion
Motion of counsel for defendant in error for dismissal of writ of error, for noncompliance by plaintiff in error with provisions of rules 23 and 24 of the rules of practice of this court (231 Fed. v, vi, 144 C.C.A. v, vi), granted, and writ of error dismissed.