Shea

Shea v. United States

Good Law
171 C.C.A. 533·260 F. 807·4 Alaska Fed. 827·1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2119
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 6, 1919No. 3311California1,960 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The plaintiff in error was charged with the murder of Ranee W. Book on November 14, 1917, at Cordova, Alaska. Some ten days prior to the homicide Book had married a woman who was the divorced wife of the plaintiff in error. She had gone to Seattle in October of that year and had met the plaintiff in error and agreed to resume the former relation. She returned to Cordova, intending, as she said, to sell her property and thereafter rejoin the plaintiff in error at Seattle. About three weeks later the plaintiff in error followed her to Cordova, and on the day on which he arrived he shot and killed the man whom she had married. The plaintiff in error was adjudged guilty of murder in the second degree. To reverse that judgment he brings this writ of error.

Error is assigned to the following instructions given to the jury after they had deliberated for a time upon their verdict and were brought into court upon the court’s order: “You have now been out about 30 hours on this case, and while I have no doubt that any differences between you are honest and sincere, I want to call your attention to the fact that in no case can absolute certainty be expected. * * * If a large number or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.