Davis

Davis v. Hutchinson

Good Law
22 F.2d 380·5 Alaska Fed. 373·1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3336
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 24, 1927No. 5160California1,627 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Dietrich, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment on the pleadings, denying plaintiff’s prayer for an accounting and the recovery from defendants of certain funds alléged to have been wrongfully and fraudulently received by them from the partnership estate of W. W. Pendergraft and John Aldridge. In brief, the facts pleaded and necessarily assumed to be admitted are as follows:

For some years prior to October 24, 1924, on which date Aldridge died, Pendergraft and Aldridge were partners engaged in the mercantile business at Fairbanks, Alaska. Exclusive of the $5,500 item, more particularly to be explained, the firm owed the aggregate amount of $17,000, and was insolvent at the time of Aldridge’s death. Pendergraft continued in' possession for the purpose of winding up the business, and on November 13, 1920, for himself and his surviving partner, he executed to defendant Hutchinson, as trustee, ¿ real and chattel mortgage covering the partnership property, to secure the payment to the trustee for the benefit of his codefendants the sum of $5,500, thus admitting that there were due the beneficiaries severally debts from the partnership aggregating that amount; but *376 such debts “had no existence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.