Wood Newton v. Harry Thomason Linda Bloodworth-Thomason Burt Reynolds Mozark Productions, Inc. Evening Shade Mtm, Inc. Cbs, Inc., Wood Newton v. Harry Thomason Linda Bloodworth-Thomason Burt Reynolds Mozark Productions, Inc. Evening Shade, a Business Entity Mtm, Inc., a California Corporation Cbs, Inc., a New York Corporation

Good Law
22 F.3d 1455·94 Daily Journal DAR 5690·22 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1609·28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1039·30 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1633
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 199493-55002California4,965 words

Opinion

Opinion

22 F.3d 1455 30 U.S.P.Q.2d 1633 , 22 Media L. Rep. 1609 Wood NEWTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harry THOMASON; Linda Bloodworth-Thomason; Burt Reynolds; Mozark Productions, Inc.; Evening Shade; MTM, Inc.; CBS, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Wood NEWTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harry THOMASON; Linda Bloodworth-Thomason; Burt Reynolds; Mozark Productions, Inc.; Evening Shade, a business entity; MTM, Inc., a California Corporation; CBS, Inc., a New York Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 93-55002, 93-55376 and 93-55379. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 9, 1994. Decided April 28, 1994. Joseph M. Gabriel, Langberg, Leslie, Mann & Gabriel, Los Angeles, CA, for appellants and cross-appellees. Beth A. Finley and Michael Plonsker, Lavely & Singer, Los Angeles, CA, for appellees and cross-appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, James M. Ideman, District Judge, Presiding. Before: PREGERSON, O'SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge PREGERSON. PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: 1 Wood Newton ("Newton") appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of television…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.