Dubinka v. Judges of Superior Court of State of California

Good Law
23 F.3d 218·94 Daily Journal DAR 4688·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6817·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2476
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 8, 199492-55736California4,892 words

Opinion

Opinion

23 F.3d 218 Michael DUBINKA; John F. Coleman; Raul Meza, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JUDGES OF the SUPERIOR COURT OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA for the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; Daniel Lungren, Attorney General of the State of California; Ira Reiner, District Attorney of Los Angeles County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55736. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 8, 1993. Decided April 8, 1994. Henry J. Hall, Deputy Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. Frederick R. Bennett, Asst. County Counsel, Donald E. de Nicola, Deputy Attorney Gen., Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, John G. Davies, District Judge, Presiding. Before: FLETCHER, PREGERSON and HALL, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge FLETCHER. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: 1 Michael Dubinka, John Coleman, and Raul Meza appeal the district court's order dismissing their action for declaratory and injunctive relief for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The district court abstained under the doctrine established in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.