United States v. Alejandro Pacheco-Osuna

Good Law
23 F.3d 269·94 Daily Journal DAR 5898·1994 WL 158036·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9320·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3075
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 2, 199493-50199California1,939 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fernandez, J.

Opinion by Judge FERNANDEZ.

Alejandro Pacheco-Osuna pled guilty to being a deported alien found in the United States. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). At sentencing, the district court departed downward because, as it said, when Pacheco was arrested he may have been stopped without good cause. The United States appealed that departure. We vacate the sentence and remand.

BACKGROUND

Pacheco was deported from this country in July of 1992. In August of 1992, he was apprehended by police from the City of Santa Fe, California, on a charge of trespassing. Pacheco did not speak English, so the police contacted the United States Border Patrol for assistance in interpreting. When it was determined that Pacheco was an alien who was improperly in the country, the police turned him over to the border patrol agents.

Thereafter, Pacheco was indicted for the crime of being a deported alien who was found in the United States. He pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement with the government. That agreement provided that if his sentence was over 21 months he could appeal, but that he otherwise waived his right to do so.

At sentencing, Pacheco argued that he should be given a downward departure because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.