Thomas Morgan v. B.J. Bunnell, Warden Attorney General of California

Good Law
24 F.3d 49·94 Daily Journal DAR 6488·1994 WL 182822·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10602·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3380
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 13, 199493-55741California1,500 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thomas Morgan was convicted for the murder of Carol May and the attempted murder of Emmerson DeVine, a couple he had met through his girlfriend, Beverly Todd. After exhausting state remedies, Morgan filed a habeas petition in federal district court. We review the district court’s denial of the petition de novo. Brown v. Borg, 951 F.2d 1011, 1014 (9th Cir.1991).

I

Morgan argues that he was denied due process because he was shackled during trial. While criminal defendants normally are entitled to appear before the jury free of shackles, “a trial judge’s decision to shackle a defendant is not per se unconstitutional.” Spain v. Rushen, 883 F.2d 712, 716 (9th Cir.1989). We review a decision to shackle for abuse of discretion. Id. at 716 .

Our eases, however, channel the exercise of that discretion. “First the court must be persuaded by compelling circumstances ‘that some measure was needed to maintain the security of the courtroom.’ Second, the court must ‘pursue less restrictive alternatives before imposing physical restraints.’” Jones v. Meyer, 899 F.2d 883, 885 (9th Cir. 1990) (quoting Spain, 883 F.2d at 720-21 ) (citations omitted); see United States v. Baker, 10 F.3d 1374, 1401…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.