Bloodgood v. Thurston County

24 F.3d 244 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James R. BLOODGOOD, a single man, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thurston COUNTY, a governmental entity; District Court of the State of Washington for Thurston County, a judicial court; Thurston County Prosecutor, a governmental entity; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35879. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 13, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James R. Bloodgood appeals the district court's summary judgment for Thurston County, the Thurston County District Court, and the Thurston County Prosecutor's Office ("defendants") in Bloodgood's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action arising out of Bloodgood's criminal prosecution for indecent exposure. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Smolen v. Deloitte, Haskins & Sells, 921 F.2d 959, 963 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm. 3 Summary judgment is…