Arcadio S. Acuna v. James Rowland, Director of Corrections of the State of California, in His Official Capacity and Individually

24 F.3d 244 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arcadio S. ACUNA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, Director of Corrections of the State of California, in his official capacity and individually; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15302. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided May 4, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arcadio S. Acuna, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment for defendant prison officials in Acuna's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Acuna alleged violations of his constitutional rights arising from restrictions imposed upon him in administrative segregation at the California State Prison--Folsom. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Hopkins v. Andaya, 958 F.2d 881, 884 (9th Cir.1992) (per curiam), and affirm. 3 Summary judgment is appropriate if the evidence, viewed…