Zoltan Attila Biro v. United States

24 F.3d 244 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Zoltan Attila BIRO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-35523. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 2, 1994. * Decided May 19, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, SCHROEDER, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Zoltan Attila Biro ("Biro") appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence which the district court imposed following his plea of guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine and distribution of cocaine. We summarized the facts of the case and addressed Biro's claim that the district court erred in not advising him of his right to appeal his sentence in a separate published opinion. We discuss here Biro's remaining claims. DISCUSSION I. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim 3 This Court reviews de novo a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.…