Roen Bogne-Legin Ana Dominguez-Lopez Roen Bonne-Dominguez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
24 F.3d 244·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19058
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 29, 199492-70636California717 words

Opinion

Opinion

24 F.3d 244 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Roen BOGNE-LEGIN; Ana Dominguez-Lopez; Roen Bonne-Dominguez, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70636. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 6, 1994. * Decided April 29, 1994. Before: BROWNING, PREGERSON, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** I. Dismissal of Petitioners' Appeal 2 The Board did not err in dismissing the Petitioners' appeal of the immigration judge's denial of asylum. "[S]ummary dismissal ... is appropriate if [the petitioner] submits no separate written brief or statement ... and inadequately informs the [Board] of what aspects of the [immigration judge's] decision were allegedly incorrect and why." Martinez-Zelaya v. INS, 841 F.2d 294, 296 (9th Cir.1988) (citations and internal quotations omitted). The Petitioners' only written submission to the Board was its notice of appeal, which alleged: 3 The Immigration Judge abused its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.