Bennett v. Clark County School Dist.

24 F.3d 244 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gary BENNETT, and all others similary situated certified braillist, past and present, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; State Board of Education, State of Nevada, Municipality, Spring Mountain Brailler's and all Appointed Trustees of Inc., Doctor McHenery, Flow McGill and Al Davis, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16657. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 17, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gary Bennett, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his complaint with prejudice as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d). Bennett claims in his complaint that he and other inmates at the Southern Desert Correctional Center did not receive promised remuneration for producing materials in braille for the Clark County School District, in violation of his constitutional right to be free…