Black v. U.S. Dist. Court, Eastern Dist. of California

24 F.3d 244 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Antonio Garfield BLACK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Deputy Clerk G. Miyasato, Jennifer Mcmains, Jury Administrator and JACK WAGNER, Clerk, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16440. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1994. * Decided April 28, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Antonio Garfield Black appeals pro se the district court's sua sponte dismissal under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) of Black's civil rights action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review the district court's dismissal under section 1915(d) for an abuse of discretion. Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992). We vacate the district court's order dismissing this action and remand for further proceedings. 1 3 Black contends that the district court erred by dismissing his civil rights complaint as…