Leroy E. Becker Beverly A. Becker v. Stanely Cress Veral Tarno Craig Zanni Lisa Wampole Coos County, Leroy E. Becker Beverly A. Becker v. Stanley Cress Veral Tarno Craig Zanni Lisa Wampole Coos County

Good Law
24 F.3d 244
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 199493-35291California943 words

Opinion

Opinion

24 F.3d 244 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leroy E. BECKER; Beverly A. Becker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Stanely CRESS; Veral Tarno; Craig Zanni; Lisa Wampole; Coos County, Defendants-Appellees. Leroy E. BECKER; Beverly A. Becker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Stanley CRESS; Veral Tarno; Craig Zanni; Lisa Wampole; Coos County, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-36681, 93-35291. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 9, 1994. * Decided April 20, 1994. Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The Beckers failed at trial to allege error in the jury instructions or the district court's decision to submit the issues of unlawful entry and arrest to the jury. Nor did they move for judgment as a matter of law. Thus, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial on the basis of these alleged errors. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 50. 3 Because the Beckers…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.