Alexander F. Beddoe v. Raymond Spillman Robert Mizell Patricia L. Cunningham Gail Arndt and Robert D. Allphin, Sr.

Good Law
24 F.3d 244·1994 WL 140637·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19051
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 199493-16753California529 words

Opinion

Opinion

24 F.3d 244 73 A.F.T.R.2d 94 -1939 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alexander F. BEDDOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Raymond SPILLMAN; Robert Mizell; Patricia L. Cunningham; Gail Arndt; and Robert D. Allphin, Sr., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16753. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided April 14, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alexander F. Beddoe appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1) motion for relief from judgment. We review for an abuse of discretion, Floyd v. Laws, 929 F.2d 1390, 1400 (9th Cir.1991), and we affirm. 3 Beddoe filed this action against several agents of the Internal Revenue Service and sought to state a claim under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for deprivation of property without due process. On July 1, 1993, the district court dismissed the action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.