Elva Eusevia Flores De Diaz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

24 F.3d 245 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Elva Eusevia FLORES DE DIAZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70722. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 9, 1994. Decided May 16, 1994. Before: HUG, FARRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Elva Eusevia Flores de Diaz requests review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying suspension of deportation under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1254 (a)(1). We affirm. 3 * The BIA may construe extreme hardship narrowly. INS v. Wang, 450 U.S. 139, 145 (1981). When it denies suspension of deportation, it must give reasons showing that it has considered all relevant factors. Batoon v. INS, 707 F.2d 399, 401 (9th Cir.1983). In determining whether a medical condition of an alien's United States citizen child constitutes extreme hardship, the Board must consider as independent factors the probable effect of deportation on the health…