Tim E. Conley v. Fred Van Sickle, and Joe Collins, Sheriff, Chelan County

24 F.3d 245 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tim E. CONLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fred VAN SICKLE, Defendant, and Joe Collins, Sheriff, Chelan County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35616. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided May 4, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Tim E. Conley appeals pro se the district court's orders (1) dismissing Conley's complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order, and (2) denying Conley's motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . 1 We affirm. 3 * Dismissal 4 We review the district court's dismissal order for abuse of discretion. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 321 (1992). Under this standard, we will not disturb the order unless we have "a definite and firm conviction that the court below committed a clear error of judgment in the…