Ashsha East v. Alan J. Coffel

24 F.3d 245 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ashsha EAST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alan J. COFFEL, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-35208. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 20, 1993. * Decided April 4, 1994. Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The petition for rehearing is granted. The memorandum disposition filed October 29, 1993 is withdrawn. The attached memorandum disposition shall be entered as the opinion of this court. All pending motions are denied as moot. 2 Ashsha EAST, Plaintiff-Appellant, 3 v. 4 Alan J. COFFEL, Defendant-Appellee. 5 Appeal from the United States District Court, for the District of Idaho, D.C. No. CV-89-1325-MHW; Mikel H. Williams, Magistrate Judge, Presiding. 6 Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 7 MEMORANDUM ** 8 Ashsha East appeals pro se the district court's judgment following a bench trial in her diversity action alleging attorney malpractice. 1 East…