Vildred M. Davis v. Northrop Corporation, a California Corporation Richard Vandal

24 F.3d 245 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Vildred M. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHROP CORPORATION, a California corporation; Richard Vandal, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-56373. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 6, 1994. * Decided May 6, 1994. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** I. 2 Plaintiff-appellant Vildred Davis ("Davis"), a Black woman, brought suit against her former employer, defendant-appellee Northrop Corporation ("Northrop"), and her former supervisor at Northrop, defendant-appellee Richard Vandal ("Vandal"), alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. Davis claimed that she was the victim of continuous and severe racial harassment and discrimination perpetrated by Vandal. Davis sought damages for discrimination she allegedly suffered while working at Northrop, as well as compensation for wages she lost as a result of her leaving…