Nancy Jewell Cross v. State of California

24 F.3d 245 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nancy Jewell CROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE of California, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15628. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided April 21, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nancy Jewell Cross appeals pro se from the district court's (1) dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) of Cross's complaint against Graeme Hanson, M.D., ("Hanson") and the City and County of San Francisco ("City"), 1 (2) summary judgment in favor of the State of California ("State"), and (3) order denying Cross's request for recusal of Judge Walker. In her action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 , Cross alleged that defendants violated her constitutional rights when they arrested her at the State Building on October 26, 1988, transported her to the San Francisco General Hospital ("SF General") and attempted to treat her for…