Steven E. Dull v. Eddie Ylst

Good Law
24 F.3d 245·1994 WL 140641·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19024
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 199493-16441California2,218 words

Opinion

Opinion

24 F.3d 245 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Steven E. DULL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eddie YLST, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16441. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided April 14, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Steven E. Dull, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Dull contends that defendants Eddie Ylst, warden of California Medical Facility (CMF); Dr. John Dann, a dental surgeon and employee of CMF; Dr. Bryant Toth, a reconstructive surgeon at the Pacific Presbyterian Medical Center; and the Pacific Presbyterian Medical Center violated his Constitutional rights when he suffered facial disfigurement and serious side effects after undergoing corrective surgery to alleviate complications from mouth cancer treatment. Specifically, Dull claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.