Joseph Dadon, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, Sylvia Dadon Dadon Marketing, Inc., Cross-Defendants-Appellees v. Milton Levinson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Joseph Dadon, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Dadon Marketing, Inc., Cross-Defendant-Appellant v. Milton Levinson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee

Good Law
24 F.3d 245·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19046
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 5, 199492-55710California2,563 words

Opinion

Opinion

24 F.3d 245 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joseph DADON, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, Sylvia Dadon; Dadon Marketing, Inc., Cross-Defendants-Appellees, v. Milton LEVINSON, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Joseph DADON, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Dadon Marketing, Inc., Cross-Defendant-Appellant, v. Milton LEVINSON, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee. Nos. 92-55710, 92-55810. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 7, 1994. Decided May 5, 1994. 1 Before: WIGGINS, T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges and REED * , District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 This diversity action arises out of a contract between Levinson and Dadon for the sale of Levinson's promotional sales business. The district court found that Dadon had breached the contract and awarded Levinson the balance due on the contract price. The district court also found that the interest provisions of the contract were uncertain, and thus denied Levinson…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.