Charles H. Cahill v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

24 F.3d 245 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles H. CAHILL, et al., Plaintiff-Appellant v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-56280. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 7, 1994. Decided April 20, 1994. 1 Before: WIGGINS and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and REED, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 The Cahills, appeal from the district court's orders granting Liberty Mutual Insurance's (hereinafter Liberty) motion to dismiss their complaint without leave to amend and dismissing the action. We vacate the judgment of dismissal and remand to permit the district court to provide a statement of reasons supporting its order denying leave to amend. 4 The Cahills bought certain agricultural property from a non-party, Elkhorn 160 Fruit Company, on or about July 7, 1983. The Cahills allege they did so in reliance upon certain representations included within written advertising materials. These…