Steve R. Gelis v. John Sullivan M.W. Hillebrand
Opinion
Opinion
24 F.3d 246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Steve R. GELIS, Petitioner-Appellant v. John SULLIVAN; M.W. Hillebrand, Respondents-Appellee. No. 93-56232. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided April 14, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Steve R. Gelis, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant prison officials. He claims the defendants improperly relied upon a subsequent federal sentence, which he has not yet begun to serve, in determining his security level and prison placement. He claims the Bureau of Prisons' "internal detainer," based upon the subsequent sentence, violates the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IADA) and his right to due process, and therefore he is entitled to mandamus relief ordering the detainer removed from his prison files. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec.…