Ike Hill, Jr. v. Francis Grazono, Adult Probation Officer Tom Agnos, McSo Ex-Sheriff Rick Romley, Maricopa County Attorney

24 F.3d 246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ike HILL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Francis GRAZONO, Adult Probation Officer; Tom Agnos, MCSO ex-Sheriff; Rick Romley, Maricopa County Attorney, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15829. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 18, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ike Hill, Jr. appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion, Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992), and affirm. 3 A district court may dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint sua sponte if the complaint is frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d). Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324 (1989). A complaint is frivolous "where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact." Id. at 325 . In civil rights cases…