Joseph Guerrero v. United States Parole Commission

24 F.3d 246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joseph GUERRERO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-50485. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 2, 1994. * Decided May 4, 1994. 1 Before: KOZINSKI and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Guerrero appeals the U.S. Parole Commission's release date determination under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 4106A(b)(2). 4 A. Guerrero first claims he is not legally in custody because a Mexican appellate court set aside his sentence. We cannot, however, reach the merits of this claim; our jurisdiction is limited to review of the Commission's determination under subsection 4106A(b)(2). Ajala v. United States Parole Comm'n, 997 F.2d 651, 653-54 (9th Cir.1993). As it was not within the Parole Commission's authority under section 4106A to vacate Guerrero's sentence, we cannot consider the validity his sentence here. 1 5 B. Guerrero…