Norman Ray Freelove v. United States

Good Law
24 F.3d 246·1994 WL 168271·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19013
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 4, 199493-35787California1,126 words

Opinion

Opinion

24 F.3d 246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Norman Ray FREELOVE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-35787. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 2, 1994. * Decided May 4, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, SCHROEDER, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Norman Ray Freelove ("Freelove") appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence for his convictions by pleas of guilty for possession of property stolen in a bank robbery, interstate transportation of traveler's checks bearing forged counter signatures, conspiracy to escape, and escape. 3 Freelove argues that his pleas of guilty were not knowing and voluntary, in violation of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 11(c) and (d) and the due process clause of the Constitution, because he did not know that he could receive consecutive sentences and because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.