Frost v. Lutz

24 F.3d 246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Raymond Ludwig FROST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas W. LUTZ, Dr., Chief of Health Services; Samuel A. Lewis, Director, ADOC; Rod Norrish, Facility Health Administrator, ADOC; W.L. Dennis, Dr., D.M.C., Dentist; M. Moses, RN, Nurse, ADOC, Miss Bolick, Physician's Assistant, ADOC; D. Salem, Dr., M.D., Doctor MCH; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16427. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 28, 1994. * Decided May 5, 1994. Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoner Raymond Ludwig Frost appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in Frost's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action, alleging prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. We affirm. 3 Frost makes three contentions. First, Frost contends that he was not granted adequate time to conduct discovery which prejudiced his reply to…