Thomas W. Hill v. J. Gary Hastings, Douglas A. McKee Abraham Gorenfeld, James H. Dempsey, Mildred L. Lillie, N. Frederick and Earl Johnson, Jr.

24 F.3d 246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Thomas W. HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. Gary HASTINGS, Douglas A. McKee, Abraham Gorenfeld, James H. Dempsey, Mildred L. Lillie, N. Frederick and Earl Johnson, Jr., Defendants-Appellees, No. 93-56303. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided April 28, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Thomas W. Hill appeals pro se the district court's orders dismissing most of his claims for lack of jurisdiction and granting summary judgment in favor of California Superior Court Judge J. Gary Hastings and other state officials on the remaining claims in Hill's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that the state court deprived him of due process in a previous action and systematically discriminates against pro se plaintiffs. We affirm. I. Hill's Action in State Court 3 On May 10, 1989, Hill brought a pro per action against Great Western Bank…