Steven D. Friend v. United Technologies/hamilton Standard Eileen Brooks John Kelliher

24 F.3d 246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Steven D. FRIEND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES/HAMILTON STANDARD; Eileen Brooks; John Kelliher, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55864. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 4, 1994. * Decided April 21, 1994. Before: HALL, LEAVY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Steven D. Friend appeals pro se from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of United Technologies/Hamilton Standard ("UT/HS") in his action alleging violation of the Veterans Reemployment Rights Act, 38 U.S.C. Sec. 2024 , breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and wrongful termination in violation of public policy under California law. 3 The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to the Veterans Reemployment Rights Act, 38 U.S.C. Sec. 2024 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and we affirm. I. 4 Friend argues that UT/HS's failure to…