Calvin Lee Holloway v. A. Olivarez, Warden

Good Law
24 F.3d 246·1994 WL 140633·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18996
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 199493-16915California2,480 words

Opinion

Opinion

24 F.3d 246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Calvin Lee HOLLOWAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A. OLIVAREZ, Warden, et al., Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-16915. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided April 14, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Calvin Lee Holloway, a state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition. After trial by jury, Holloway was convicted of robbery and sentenced to a three-year middle term for the conviction plus two five-year prior conviction enhancements for a total term of thirteen years. Holloway contends that the district court erred when it denied his claims for insufficiency of the evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, prejudicial evidence, ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel and cumulative error. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We accept the district court's factual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.