Fontana Water Co. v. City Of Fontana
Opinion
Opinion
24 F.3d 246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FONTANA WATER CO., d/b/a San Gabriel Valley Water Co., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF FONTANA, Nathan A. Simon, Mayor, William Kragness, Gary Boyles, Patricia Murray, Ben L. Abernathy, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55402. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 4, 1993. Decided May 4, 1994. Before: NOONAN, FERNANDEZ and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Fontana Water Company appeals from the district court's partial summary judgment and abstention rulings in favor of the defendant, the City of Fontana. The Water Company argues that (1) there were genuine issues of material fact as to its procedural due process, impairment of contract, and inverse condemnation claims, and (2) the district court abused its discretion in abstaining on the Water Company's substantive due process claim. We reverse the district court on its abstention on the substantive due process claim, but…