In Re Grand Chevrolet, Inc.

Good Law
24 F.3d 246
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 199492-56415California806 words

Opinion

Opinion

24 F.3d 246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re GRAND CHEVROLET, INC., and related entities, including: Grand Motors, Inc.; Grand Wilshire Finance Corp., Grand Rizal Finance Corp., Grand Wilshire Capital, Inc., Debtors. Irving SULMEYER, Chapter 11 Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GLENDALE MITSUBISHI, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-56415. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 7, 1994. Decided May 6, 1994. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing June 28, 1994. 1 Before: FARRIS, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Trustee Irving Sulmeyer appeals the granting of summary judgment to Glendale Mitsubishi. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo. In re Food Catering & Housing, Inc., 971 F.2d 396 , 397 (9th Cir.1992). 4 We have carefully reviewed the record. Glendale introduced uncontroverted evidence that from January 1988 through mid-April 1988 (prior to the 90 day preference period), the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.