Fore v. Blackmer

24 F.3d 246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dan C. FORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aimee BLACKMER; Andrea Blackmer; Nick Kantaros; Jane Doe Kantros; Continental Casualty Company, a corporation; Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Company, a corporation; Geico Insurance Companies, a California corporation; Elizabeth C. Painter, an individual; John A. Michael, an individual; Gary G. May, an individual; Kenneth L. Fields, Judge, an individual; David L. Roberts, Judge, an individual; Mesa Superior Court, State of Arizona; Eugenia Vasilas, an individual, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17052. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 16, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dan C. Fore appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging constitutional violations and state tort claims against the judges, attorneys, defendants, and…