R. Thomas Merrill, Moses Libitzky and Marina Center, a California General Partnership v. City of Richmond

Good Law
24 F.3d 247·1994 WL 161958·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18793
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 29, 199492-17011California281 words

Opinion

Opinion

24 F.3d 247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. R. Thomas MERRILL, Moses Libitzky; and Marina Center, a California General Partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF RICHMOND, et al., Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-17011. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 10, 1994. Decided April 29, 1994. Before: HUG, FARRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 ORDER * 2 We affirm the granting of the preliminary injunction on the basis of the district court's order of October 30, 1992. There was no abuse of discretion in the district court's evaluation of the probability of success on the merits and the risk of imminent, irreparable harm. Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Comm'n v. National Football League, 634 F.2d 1197 , 1201 (9th Cir.1980). 3 We decline to review the district court's denial of appellants' motion to dismiss. Appropriately viewed as a motion for summary judgment, the order denying the motion is not reviewable in the appeal of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.