Alicia Nieto Jacobs v. Maricopa County

24 F.3d 247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alicia Nieto JACOBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16675. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 13, 1994. Decided May 9, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 Appellant Alicia Nieto Jacobs appeals the district court's dismissal of her complaint against the County of Maricopa alleging unlawful employment discrimination under Title VII and other state and local laws. The district court found that the first two counts of Jacobs' complaint were time barred and that a third count failed to state a claim because the only named defendant, the County, exercised no control over the personnel involved. 3 We reverse and remand to the district court for further proceedings and with the instruction that Jacobs be allowed to amend her complaint. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 4 Jacobs was working…