In Re: Lew Stewart McGinnis Dba: Lew McGinnis Co., Debtor. Lew S. McGinnis Michael R. Mastro v. Kelly McGinnis Danny McGinnis

Good Law
24 F.3d 247·1994 WL 168291·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18795
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 4, 199493-36087California658 words

Opinion

Opinion

24 F.3d 247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re: Lew Stewart MCGINNIS, dba: Lew McGinnis Co., Debtor. Lew S. McGINNIS; Michael R. Mastro, Appellant, v. Kelly MCGINNIS; Danny McGinnis, Appellees. No. 93-36087. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided May 4, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Mastro and Lew McGinnis (bankruptcy debtor), hereinafter "Lew", appeal the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's (BAP) order reversing the bankruptcy court's summary judgment for Mastro and McGinnis in an adversary action brought by McGinnis's children, Kelly and Dan McGinnis. The McGinnis children are seeking to invalidate an agreement subordinating their liens on real property owed by the debtor, Lew McGinnis, to those of Mastro. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 . We review de novo a Bankruptcy Appellate Panel decision, Vanderpark Properties, Inc. v. Buchbinder (In re…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.