Metcalf v. County of Sutter

24 F.3d 247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Bonnie METCALF, Michael Mays; Robert Mitchell, a minor, through his guardian ad litem Bonnie Metcalf, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SUTTER, a political subdivision of the State of California; Ray Algernon Gordon, Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-16712. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 10, 1994. Decided May 2, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Bonnie Metcalf, her son Robert Mitchell, and Michael Mays appeal the district court's summary judgment in favor of Sutter County deputy sheriffs, a Sutter County deputy district attorney, the Sutter County Sheriff and District Attorney, the Sutter County Board of Supervisors, and Sutter County in the plaintiffs' 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. In their action, the plaintiffs alleged due process and fourth amendment violations arising out of the defendants' eviction of the plaintiffs after…