Samir Kazan, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. G.A.M. Enterprises, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant, and Gabriel A. Maalouf

24 F.3d 247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Samir KAZAN, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellee, v. G.A.M. ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant-counter-claimant, and Gabriel A. MAALOUF, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-56038. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 13, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gabriel A. Maalouf appeals pro se the district court's order closing the case and directing the Clerk to return Maalouf's third motion for clarification. Construing the order as a denial of a motion for relief from judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion, Floyd v. Laws, 929 F.2d 1390, 1400 (9th Cir.1991), and affirm. 1 3 Samir Kazan filed this diversity action against Maalouf, G.A.M. Enterprises, Inc. and Big H Corporation on November 23, 1983. The clerk entered a default judgment against Maalouf and Big H…