Colvin McCright v. Daniel B. Vasquez, Warden

24 F.3d 247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Colvin McCRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Daniel B. VASQUEZ, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-16361. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 25, 1994. * Decided May 5, 1994. Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Colvin McCright, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. McCright contends that the district court erred when it dismissed his complaint which alleged that he was deprived of property without due process of law. We affirm. 3 McCright claims that San Quentin employees, contrary to state regulations, failed to inform him of the property restrictions at Folsom before he was transferred there, and he was forced to forfeit several items of personal property as a result of that omission. Negligent Deprivation of Property 4 As long as a deprivation of property is…